IP: 123.*.*.* India

First of all we should thank Both Mr. Wavoo Samsuddeen and Mr. Abubacker for their noble effort.

A group of people (Rich, famous and an infamous) selected some among themselves as the members of the peace committee without the approval from the general public.

1) சமாதானக் குழுவில் இடம் பெற்றவர்களில் ஒருவருடைய பெயரைப் பார்க்கும் பொது பிள்ளையை கிள்ளிவிடும் சுபாவமுள்ளவரிடம் தொட்டிலை ஆட்டச் சொல்லியிருப்பது தெளிவாகிறது.

2) ஐக்கிய பேரவையுடை செயல்பாடும் ஒரு காரணம் என்றரிந்த பின்னரும் அப்பேரவையைச் சார்ந்தவர்களை அந்த சமாதானக் குழுவில் தொடர்ந்து இடம்பெறச் செய்வது unreasonable therefore objectionable.

பிரச்சனைகளுக்கு (கண்டறியப்பட்டதாகச் சொல்லப்பட்ட) காரணங்கள் (4) சரியா, தவறா என்ற விவாதத்திற்குச் சொல்லும் முன், சமாதானக் குழு ஏன் 3 காரணங்களுக்கு மட்டும் பரிந்துரைகள் செய்துள்ளது?. 4 வது காரணத்திற்கு பரிந்துரை செய்யாதது ஏன் என்பதை அறிந்தாக வேண்டும்.

மறந்துவிட்டார்களா? தயங்குகிறார்களா? அல்லது தவிர்க்கிறார்களா?

As far as the Peace committee's findings are concern,

1) It has failed to identify and name the person responsible for the root cause and conveniently forgot to advice him not to interfere.

2) Media has nothing to do with current impasse. Allegation against media is biased, unjust and untenable. Above all improbable.

3) Indirect accusation(s) against the chairman for some wrong doing is indefensible.

As far as the Peace committee's recommendation(s) are concern,

1) Coercing an elected body to give up some of its power is Illegal. An elected person who relinquishes his/her given rights to unauthorized committee may invites legal action.

2) Media is the fourth pillar of Democracy. Restricting media from doing its job is undemocratic..

3) Recommendation(s) given to Aikkiya Peravai is a water downed version of the recommendations made 3 years ago by some 6 well known organizations backed by the educated elites of our town.

Present recommendation to peravai is nothing but an appeasement.

In nutshell
The peace committee itself is objectionable.
Its findings are biased, untrue and improbable.
Its recommendations are illegal, impracticable, unrealistic and undemocratic.

Criticizing without offering solution is not a right thing to do.

My finding is that, I have been observing the events unfolding right from the beginning. The problem started during the vice-chairman election. Elected person was blessed and backed by a Chennai based businessman. He become his viceroy and executing the businessman's commands. This businessman started 'horse trade". Now he has seventeen horses in his stable. Since his stable jockey disappeared from the scene, he become the jockey himself. he is boastful of his stable. Some of his steeds are doing all the dirty works with the co-operation from their kind.

Only way to solve the problem is to tell him to mind his business and warn him not to meddle with other people's business.