IP: 123.*.*.* India

Ref: comment #13 By Abdul Kader (Abu Dhabi)
&
Ref:comment #21 By Abdul Azeez (Chennai)

"ஜலாலிய்யாவில் நடந்த அனைத்து ஜமாஅத் தார்கள் கூட்டத்தில் கையெழுத்திட மறுத்தவர்களை ஆய்வுக்கு எடுத்துக் கொள்ளலாமா என்று பேரவையால் கேட்கப்பட்டது. அதில் கலந்து கொண்ட அனைத்து ஜமாஅத்தினரும் பொது நல அமைப்புகளும் அதற்கு அனுமதி வழங்கவில்லை."

The authors of both the comments (13 & 21) are either liars or Jaalraas.

I challenge them to prove if what they say is true. They were not there, but I was.

Nobody has asked us to debate / discuss on those (3 applicants) who refused to sign. They were already rejected by Aikkiya Peravai or by those 25 people selected by Aikkiya peravai.

When we were waiting for the meeting to start, I noticed one of the volunteers having a voting slip in his hand. I asked my fellow voter to get the slip from the volunteer to see who are the candidates. I saw only 4 names on it and the 4 were those who signed the precondition.

Later we were informed that they were 7 applicants and only 4 candidates are in the fray, the other 3 were not qualified because they refused sign the precondition put forward by Peravai.

The assignment given to us was either to discuss about 4 candidates or to elect them directly without any discussion. Nothing was said about the 3 applicants who refused to sign. they were already rejected by peravai not by us (voters). We voter had nothing to do with the 3's rejection.

I humbly request those 2 not to spread the falsehood. As the Quran says, Falsehoods are by their nature bound to perish.

I hope I made it clear and if anybody differs, I invite him / them to prove me wrong.